App Intents Code Review

---

name: app-intents-code-review description: Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

---

App Intents Code Review

Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | AppIntent protocol, perform(), return types | references/intent-structure.md | | AppEntity, EntityQuery, identifiers | references/entities.md | | AppShortcutsProvider, phrases, discovery | references/shortcuts.md | | @Parameter, validation, dynamic options | references/parameters.md |

Review Checklist

[ ] perform() marked with @MainActor if accessing UI/main thread resources

[ ] perform() completes within 30-second timeout (no heavy downloads/processing)

[ ] Custom errors conform to CustomLocalizedStringResourceConvertible

[ ] EntityQuery.entities(for:) handles missing identifiers gracefully

[ ] EntityStringQuery used if Siri voice input needed (not plain EntityQuery)

[ ] suggestedEntities() returns reasonable defaults for disambiguation

[ ] AppShortcut phrases include .applicationName parameter

[ ] Non-optional @Parameter has sensible defaults or uses requestValue()

[ ] @IntentParameterDependency not used on iOS 16 targets (crashes)

[ ] Phrases localized in AppShortcuts.strings, not Localizable.strings

[ ] App Intents defined in app bundle, not Swift Package (pre-iOS 17)

[ ] isDiscoverable = false for internal/widget-only intents

When to Load References

AppIntent protocol implementation -> intent-structure.md

Entity queries, identifiers, Spotlight -> entities.md

App Shortcuts, phrases, discovery -> shortcuts.md

Parameter validation, dynamic options -> parameters.md

Review Questions

1. Does perform() handle timeout limits for long-running operations? 2. Are entity queries self-contained (no @Dependency injection in Siri context)? 3. Do phrases read naturally and include the app name? 4. Are SwiftData models passed by persistentModelID, not directly? 5. Would migrating from SiriKit break existing user shortcuts?

Hard gates (before reporting)

Complete in order for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.

1. Location artifact — The finding includes [FILE:LINE] (or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo. 2. Scope read — You read the full surrounding type: the AppIntent / AppEntity / EntityQuery / AppShortcutsProvider (or equivalent) that contains the flagged code, not only a diff hunk or snippet. 3. Platform or integration claim (only if the finding depends on minimum iOS, Swift Package vs app target, @IntentParameterDependency availability, SiriKit migration, or isDiscoverable / extension placement) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET or target membership in the Xcode project, Package.swift platforms, entitlements, or where the intent file lives) or you drop or downgrade the finding to an open question. 4. Protocol — Pre-report steps in review-verification-protocol are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).

Use the issue format [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.