aurora-norfolk
by @timcoy47
produce a practical 3-day northern lights planning and live-update workflow for tim in dereham, norfolk, with alert-day escalation, north norfolk coast compa...
clawhub install aurora-norfolkπ About This Skill
name: aurora-norfolk description: produce a practical 3-day northern lights planning and live-update workflow for tim in dereham, norfolk, with alert-day escalation, north norfolk coast comparison, and conservative go or no-go decisions. use when asked to check aurora chances, build aurora alerts, compare dereham vs the coast, issue alert-night updates, or maintain a rolling northern lights watch for norfolk. allowed-tools: web_search, http_request, calculator, file_read, file_write
Aurora Norfolk
Produce a practical aurora-planning service for Tim in Dereham, Norfolk, UK.
Keep the job narrow:
Core objective
Estimate the practical visible chance of seeing the aurora for:
Treat the percentage as a blended viewing chance for Tim, not a pure physics probability. Combine space weather, darkness, cloud, visibility, moon penalty, and the horizon advantage of the coast.
Data priority
Use sources in this order when available:
1. NOAA SWPC for aurora and geomagnetic conditions. - Use the short-lead OVATION aurora forecast for near-term timing. - Use real-time solar-wind context when describing why conditions are improving or fading. - Use the 3-day geomagnetic forecast for the rolling 3-day outlook. 2. Met Office site-specific forecast data for local sky conditions. - Compare Dereham with one or more North Norfolk coast points. - Focus on cloud and any visibility or haze proxies available. 3. AuroraWatch UK for UK-facing alert context and sanity checking.
If the authoritative feeds disagree, say so and lower confidence. If a key feed is stale or unavailable, say so explicitly and reduce confidence.
Locations
Always produce two location outcomes:
For the coastal view, prefer a place with a cleaner northern horizon and lower local light pollution than Dereham. If a specific coastal point is needed for weather lookup, pick a practical North Norfolk coastal point and stay consistent within that run.
Decision model
Score the following components mentally and convert them into practical percentages:
1. Space-weather strength
Weight heavily:2. Sky quality
Weight heavily:3. Darkness and moon penalty
Consider:4. Location advantage
Apply:Status thresholds
Set status from the coast chance:
These thresholds are operating rules for this workflow, not scientific absolutes.
Travel recommendation rules
Use only one action:
Apply these rules:
Communication modes
Choose the output mode that matches the request or automation stage.
A. 3-day outlook
Use for the daily planning run.Return a compact 3-night table with:
Then add:
B. Change alert
Use only when something materially changed.Trigger a change alert when any of these happen:
Keep the message short:
C. Alert-day brief
Use on any alert_day or high_alert night.Return:
D. Live-night update
Use during the active viewing period.Think in 15-minute checks but communicate in 30-minute viewing windows. Send a live-night update only when:
Return:
Output rules
Always:
Never:
Default message templates
3-day outlook template
Use this structure unless a different format is explicitly requested:
Aurora Norfolk β 3-night outlook| Night | Dereham | Coast | Status | Confidence | Note |
| --- | ---: | ---: | --- | --- | --- |
| Tonight | 12% | 19% | no_watch | medium | weak activity, cloud risk |
| Tomorrow | 24% | 37% | alert_day | medium | better coast horizon and clearer sky |
| Day 3 | 18% | 28% | watchlist | low | setup possible but uncertain |
Best candidate: Tomorrow
Action now: watch
Next check: 17:30
Change alert template
Aurora update: Tomorrow moved from watchlist to alert_day.
Coast chance rose from 31% to 43%.
Best window shifted to 22:30β00:00.
Reason: stronger geomagnetic outlook and improved coast cloud forecast.
Action: watch.
Alert-day brief template
Aurora Norfolk β tonightDereham chance: 22%
North Norfolk coast chance: 41%
Confidence: medium
Best window: 22:30β00:00
Likely outcome: possible by eye on the coast, weaker inland
Why:
aurora guidance is elevated enough for southern visibility
cloud is thinner on the coast than inland
timing lines up with full darkness Action: go_coast
Next check: 21:15
Live-night template
22:00 updateDereham: 18%
North Norfolk coast: 46%
Best next window: 22:30β23:00
Confidence: medium
Why:
short-lead aurora guidance remains supportive
coast cloud is still thinner than inland
conditions are holding rather than strengthening Action: go_coast
Next check: 22:15
Workflow
Follow this order:
1. Determine the relevant local-night period in Europe/London time. 2. Read the most authoritative aurora guidance available for the requested horizon. 3. Read local sky conditions for Dereham and a North Norfolk coast comparison point. 4. Convert the combined picture into practical percentages. 5. Choose status from the coast chance. 6. Choose one action only. 7. Use the correct communication mode. 8. Suppress noise unless a material change threshold was met.
Setup notes for OpenClaw
When this skill is used inside OpenClaw:
Read {baseDir}/references/openclaw-setup.md when installation or cron examples are needed.
Read {baseDir}/references/source-checklist.md when deciding what data to collect.
Read {baseDir}/references/message-rules.md when shaping notifications.