🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter Guide β€” Subscribe β†’
BytesAgainBytesAgain
πŸ¦€ ClawHub

Board Meeting

by @alirezarezvani

Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isola...

Versionv2.1.1
Downloads605
Installs3
TERMINAL
clawhub install board-meeting

πŸ“– About This Skill


name: "board-meeting" description: "Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:board, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question." license: MIT metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: Alireza Rezvani category: c-level domain: board-protocol updated: 2026-03-05 frameworks: 6-phase-board, two-layer-memory, independent-contributions

Board Meeting Protocol

Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.

Keywords

board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /cs:board, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives

Invoke

/cs:board [topic] β€” e.g. /cs:board Should we expand to Spain in Q3?


The 6-Phase Protocol

PHASE 1: Context Gathering

1. Load memory/company-context.md 2. Load memory/board-meetings/decisions.md (Layer 2 ONLY β€” never raw transcripts) 3. Reset session state β€” no bleed from previous conversations 4. Present agenda + activated roles β†’ wait for founder confirmation

Chief of Staff selects relevant roles based on topic (not all 9 every time): | Topic | Activate | |-------|----------| | Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO | | Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO | | Hiring/org | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO | | Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO | | Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |


PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)

No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.

Order: Research (if needed) β†’ CMO β†’ CFO β†’ CEO β†’ CTO β†’ COO β†’ CHRO β†’ CRO β†’ CISO β†’ CPO

Reasoning techniques: CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data

Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):

## [ROLE] β€” [DATE]

Key points (max 5): β€’ [Finding] β€” [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] β€” 🟒/🟑/πŸ”΄ β€’ [Finding] β€” [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] β€” 🟒/🟑/πŸ”΄

Recommendation: [clear position] Confidence: High / Medium / Low Source: [where the data came from] What would change my mind: [specific condition]

Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.


PHASE 3: Critic Analysis

Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.

Checklist:

  • Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)
  • What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?
  • Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)
  • What risk has nobody mentioned?
  • Which agent operated outside their domain?

  • PHASE 4: Synthesis

    Chief of Staff delivers using the Board Meeting Output format (defined in agent-protocol/SKILL.md):
  • Decision Required (one sentence)
  • Perspectives (one line per contributing role)
  • Where They Agree / Where They Disagree
  • Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)
  • Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)
  • Your Call (options if founder disagrees)

  • PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️

    Full stop. Wait for the founder.

    ⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW β€” [Paste synthesis]

    Options: βœ… Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up

    Rules:

  • User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..."
  • 30-min inactivity β†’ auto-close as "pending review"
  • Reopen any time with /cs:board resume

  • PHASE 6: Decision Extraction

    After founder approval:
  • Layer 1: Write full transcript β†’ memory/board-meetings/YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md
  • Layer 2: Append approved decisions β†’ memory/board-meetings/decisions.md
  • Mark rejected proposals [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
  • Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added

  • Memory Structure

    memory/board-meetings/
    β”œβ”€β”€ decisions.md          # Layer 2 β€” founder-approved only (Phase 1 loads this)
    β”œβ”€β”€ YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md     # Layer 1 β€” full transcripts (never auto-loaded)
    └── archive/YYYY/         # Raw transcripts after 90 days
    

    Future meetings load Layer 2 only. Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.


    Failure Mode Quick Reference

    | Failure | Fix | |---------|-----| | Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against" | | Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence | | Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda | | Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis | | Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads decisions.md only β€” hard rule |


    References

  • templates/meeting-agenda.md β€” agenda format
  • templates/meeting-minutes.md β€” final output format
  • references/meeting-facilitation.md β€” conflict handling, timing, failure modes