BytesAgain is a curated directory of 60,000+ AI agent skills from ClawHub, GitHub, LobeHub, and Dify. Search skills by keyword in 7 languages, browse by role (developer, creator, trader, marketer) or by use case.

How do I find AI skills on BytesAgain?

Use the search bar on BytesAgain.com to search by keyword in 7 languages. You can also browse by role (developer, creator, trader, marketer) or by use case. Each skill shows install instructions for Claude, Cursor, OpenClaw, Continue, and more.

Yes, BytesAgain is completely free. No registration required for searching skills. The MCP API is also free with rate limits.

Does BytesAgain have an API for AI agents?

Yes! BytesAgain provides a free MCP SSE endpoint at /api/mcp/sse for AI agents, plus a REST API at /api/mcp?action=search&q= . No authentication needed.

Can I request a new AI skill on BytesAgain?

Yes! Visit the Requests page on BytesAgain.com to submit a skill request. Your request will be visible to the community and notified to the site admin.

🦀 ClawHub

Desirable Difficulty Classifier

by @quochungto

Classify any learning activity, practice structure, or instructional design element as a desirable difficulty (strengthens encoding) or undesirable difficult...

Versionv1.0.0

#crypto-defi #legal #education

⚡ When to Use

Trigger	Action
- An instructional designer completed a course outline and wants an evidence-based difficulty audit before launch
- A trainer notices participants are not retaining material and suspects the difficulty structure is wrong
- A learner is working through a study method (e.g., rereading, re-watching lectures) and wants to know why nothing is sticking
- A corporate L&D team is redesigning onboarding and wants to know which difficulties to add or remove
- A coach wants to evaluate a practice regimen for an athlete, musician, or professional
Before starting, verify:
- Is a description of the learning activity available? (Enough to understand what the learner does during practice or study)
- What is the learner's background and the intended skill being developed?
Mode: Hybrid — The agent runs the classification analysis and generates the report. The human decides which recommendations to implement.

💡 Examples

Example 1 — Corporate Onboarding Audit

Input: A new-employee onboarding program: Day 1 is a full-day lecture with slides covering company history, culture, and processes. Employees are given a manual to read. No assessment. Employees shadow a senior colleague for Day 2 and Day 3. Week 2 is independent work.

Classification results:

Full-day lecture: UNDESIRABLE — passive reception with no retrieval requirement; massed (one day), no spacing

Read-only manual: UNDESIRABLE — rereading analog; creates familiarity, not retrievability

Shadowing: PARTIAL — observational, not generative; no retrieval or elaboration required

Independent work (Week 2): DESIRABLE — real-world variation; generation required; implicit spacing from Day 1

Strategy presence:

Retrieval practice: ABSENT

Spacing: ABSENT (Day 1 lecture never revisited before independent work)

Interleaving: ABSENT

Variation: PARTIAL (Week 2 provides it)

Generation: PARTIAL (Week 2 only)

Elaboration: ABSENT

Top recommendation: Add three retrieval prompts at the end of Day 1: "Without looking at your notes, write down the three things from today that you'll need to do in your first solo task." Low effort, high impact.

Example 2 — Medical Training Workshop

Input: A one-day continuing education workshop for physicians: Morning session is two hours of case presentations (attending presents, residents watch). Afternoon is small-group discussion of cases. Participants complete a satisfaction survey at the end.

Classification results:

Case presentations (passive): UNDESIRABLE — observation only; no retrieval, no generation

Small-group discussion: DESIRABLE — elaboration present (connecting to prior cases); generation partial (if participants must propose diagnoses before attending reveals it)

Satisfaction survey: UNDESIRABLE difficulty marker (not a learning assessment)

Strategy presence:

Retrieval practice: ABSENT

Spacing: ABSENT (single-day event, no follow-up)

Interleaving: PARTIAL (cases are varied topics)

Variation: PRESENT (diverse cases)

Generation: PARTIAL (discussion may require it, but not consistently)

Elaboration: PARTIAL (discussion context encourages it)

Top recommendation: Restructure case presentations as retrieval events: present the case with findings, pause, ask participants to write their diagnosis before the attending reveals it. Same content, same time — but changes passive observation to active retrieval.

Example 3 — Self-Study Method Audit

Input: A software developer studying for a certification exam: studies by watching tutorial videos twice through, then reads the official guide once. Exam is in four weeks.

Classification results:

Re-watching videos: UNDESIRABLE — rereading analog; repeated exposure creates familiarity, not retrieval strength

Reading official guide: UNDESIRABLE alone — passive encoding with no retrieval requirement

Strategy presence:

Retrieval practice: ABSENT

Spacing: ABSENT (all material consumed in a compressed initial period)

Interleaving: ABSENT (one topic fully before moving to next)

Variation: ABSENT (single source format)

Generation: ABSENT

Elaboration: ABSENT

Assessment: This method has zero desirable difficulty strategies. High effort with low expected retention. The learner will feel prepared (familiarity illusion) and underperform on the exam.

Top recommendation: Replace re-watching with self-quizzing. After watching each video once, close it and write down the five most important concepts from memory. Check against the video. Repeat for missed items only. This single change introduces retrieval practice, generation, and implicit spacing — three strategies at once.

View on ClawHub

TERMINAL

clawhub install bookforge-desirable-difficulty-classifier