Persuasion Content Auditor
by @quochungto
Audit, analyze, review, or score any persuasive content against the 6 principles of influence: reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, liking,...
Scenario: SaaS signup page audit Trigger: "Here's our landing page β why isn't it converting better?" Process: Agent reads the full page copy. Reciprocity: Missing β page leads immediately with pricing and features, no value-first gift. Commitment: Weak β has a CTA but no micro-commitments (no quiz, no "see if you qualify" step). Social Proof: Strong β has customer logos, testimonials with results, user counts. Liking: Weak β corporate tone, no shared struggles, no warmth. Authority: Strong β founders cited in press, credentials listed. Scarcity: Missing β no deadline or limited access signal. Output: Score 8/18. Top 3 opportunities: (1) Add a free tool or resource offer above the fold for reciprocity β include specific copy for a "free audit" widget. (2) Add a micro-commitment step before the main CTA β "See if [Product] is right for you" quiz. (3) Add a "beta cohort closing Friday" deadline with demand-driven explanation.
Scenario: Cold outreach email audit Trigger: "My open rates are fine but replies are terrible β can you audit this email?" Process: Agent reads the email. Reciprocity: Weak β mentions a case study but doesn't lead with it as a gift. Commitment: Missing β no small ask, jumps straight to "schedule a call." Social Proof: Missing β no evidence of results, no similar clients. Liking: Weak β template-feeling language, no demonstrated research into recipient. Authority: Strong β mentions publications and company size. Scarcity: Missing. Output: Score 5/18. The email establishes authority (who they are) but fails to give value first, build connection, or reduce the friction of a large first ask. Top opportunity: Lead with a specific insight about the recipient's business (liking through demonstrated attention), offer it as a free observation (reciprocity), then ask for a smaller commitment than a call β "Would it be useful if I sent you the full analysis?" builds commitment before scheduling.
Scenario: B2B proposal document audit Trigger: "I keep losing deals at proposal stage β audit this proposal." Process: Agent reads the proposal. Reciprocity: Strong β includes a free discovery findings section. Commitment: Strong β proposal references agreements made in discovery call ("As you said you needed..."). Social Proof: Weak β includes two testimonials but from different industries. Liking: Strong β personalized language, references shared goals. Authority: Strong β case studies with detailed results. Scarcity: Counterproductive β says "this offer expires in 30 days" but the timeline feels arbitrary and manufactured. Output: Score 13/18. Strongest proposal areas are authority, liking, and commitment. The scarcity claim is backfiring β it reads as a pressure tactic rather than a genuine constraint, which undermines the trust built elsewhere. Fix: Replace arbitrary deadline with demand-driven scarcity ("We can only take on 2 new clients this quarter due to onboarding capacity") and fix social proof by adding a case study from the prospect's industry.
clawhub install bookforge-persuasion-content-auditor