Capability Assessment

---

name: capability-assessment description: "Assess organizational capabilities using radar charts. Use for competitive analysis, gap identification, and strategic planning."

---

Capability Assessment

Metadata

Name: capability-assessment

Description: Visual capability mapping and competitive comparison

Triggers: capability assessment, radar chart, spider chart, competency mapping

Instructions

Assess capabilities for $ARGUMENTS, compare against benchmarks, identify gaps.

Output

## Capability Assessment: [Company/Unit]
Capability Radar

Innovation ★ /|\ / | \ / | \ / | \ Brand ─────────────── Operations \ | / \ | / \ | / \|/ ★ Customer Insight

─── Our Company - - Benchmark/Competitor

Capability Scores
| Capability | Our Score | Benchmark | Gap | Priority |
|------------|-----------|-----------|-----|----------|
| Innovation | 7/10 | 8/10 | -1 | Medium |
| Operations | 8/10 | 7/10 | +1 | ✅ Strength |
| Customer Insight | 6/10 | 8/10 | -2 | High |
| Brand | 7/10 | 9/10 | -2 | High |
| Digital | 5/10 | 8/10 | -3 | Critical |
Capability Details
Strengths
| Capability | Score | Evidence |
|------------|-------|----------|
| Operations | 8/10 | [Evidence] |
Gaps
| Capability | Gap | Impact | Action |
|------------|-----|--------|--------|
| Digital | -3 | High | [Action] |
Investment Priorities
1. [Capability 1] - Gap: X, Impact: High → Action: [Description]
2. [Capability 2] - Gap: Y, Impact: Medium → Action: [Description]

Tips

Use 5-8 capabilities for clarity

Score 1-10 with clear definitions

Compare to best-in-class, not average

Involve multiple stakeholders for objectivity

References

Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, Gary. "The Core Competence of the Corporation". HBR, 1990.

Use 5-8 capabilities for clarity

Score 1-10 with clear definitions

Compare to best-in-class, not average

Involve multiple stakeholders for objectivity