cosmetic-detect

---

name: cosmetic-detect version: 1.0.0 description: Analyze facial/body photos to detect signs of cosmetic surgery or aesthetic procedures. Use when the user uploads a photo and asks to identify cosmetic work, detect plastic surgery, assess facial naturalness, check if someone has had work done, analyze before/after photos, or evaluate aesthetic procedure signs. Also trigger when users ask about specific procedures visible in photos (fillers, Botox, rhinoplasty, jaw contouring, etc.), compare photos for surgical changes, or want a "naturalness score" for a face. Works with single images, multiple comparison images, and video screenshots. 触发词：整容检测、看看有没有整、自然度评分、鉴定一下、有没有动过。

---

Cosmetic Surgery Detection

Core Principle

Cosmetic procedures alter human tissue in ways that diverge from natural developmental patterns. Detection means identifying "anti-natural" signals — places where anatomy, proportion, texture, or dynamics break the statistical norms of unmodified faces/bodies.

This is adversarial: the best work is designed to be undetectable. Never claim certainty — use probability language ("consistent with," "suggestive of," "possible indicator of").

Analysis Protocol

Before analysis, read references/analysis-framework.md for the detailed region-by-region indicator checklist.

Step 1: Initial Assessment

Image quality: Resolution, lighting, angle, makeup level. Low quality or heavy filters significantly reduce reliability — say so.

Apparent ethnicity/ancestry: Establishes anatomical baseline. A "high nose bridge" is normal for Europeans but statistically unusual for East Asians.

Apparent age: Sets expectations for skin quality, volume, aging signs.

Filters/editing: Check for digital manipulation (smoothing, warping, face-tuning) — flag these as NOT cosmetic surgery to avoid false positives.

Step 2: Region-by-Region Analysis

Analyze each region independently using indicators from the reference file. For each region assess:

1. Are features within normal range for the person's apparent ethnicity and age? 2. Are there specific indicators of surgical or non-surgical intervention? 3. Confidence level: Low / Medium / High

Step 3: Cross-Region Coherence Check

The most powerful detection layer. Natural faces have internal consistency. Look for:

Ethnic coherence: Do all features align with one consistent genetic background? (e.g., East Asian bone structure + Caucasian nose bridge = mismatch)

Age coherence: Do all regions show consistent aging? (smooth forehead but aged hands = possible Botox)

Symmetry: Natural faces have asymmetry. Excessive bilateral symmetry suggests correction.

Proportion harmony: Do ratios between features fall within natural ranges?

Step 4: Output

## 整容检测分析 / Cosmetic Procedure Detection Analysis
基础信息 / Baseline
图像质量评估 / Image quality assessment
参考人种基线 / Ethnic baseline reference
年龄估计 / Estimated age
滤镜/修图评估 / Filter/editing assessment
区域分析 / Regional Analysis
For each region with findings:
观察到的特征 / Observed features
可能的项目 / Possible procedure(s)
置信度 / Confidence: Low|Medium|High
判断依据 / Reasoning
整体协调性 / Cross-Region Coherence
种族特征一致性 / Ethnic feature consistency
年龄一致性 / Age consistency
对称性分析 / Symmetry analysis
总评 / Overall Assessment
自然度评分 / Naturalness score (1-10, 10=completely natural)
最可能的项目清单 / Most likely procedures (if any)
整体置信度 / Overall confidence
重要声明 / Important disclaimer

Use the user's language. Template above is bilingual for reference.

Special Modes

Before/After Comparison

When 2+ photos of the same person at different times are provided:

Align facial landmarks mentally between photos

Prioritize skeletal/structural changes as highest confidence (bone/cartilage don't change naturally)

Volume changes could be aging, weight, OR fillers

Skin/texture changes could be aging, skincare, OR procedures

Celebrity/Public Figure

Use knowledge of their appearance history if available

Note that top-tier surgeons' work is hardest to detect

Be especially careful with confidence levels

Batch Analysis

When analyzing multiple people (group photo, set of photos):

Analyze each person independently

Use the group as a natural baseline for comparison

Guidelines

Never claim certainty. Even experienced surgeons can't always tell from photos.

Acknowledge limitations. Lighting, angle, makeup, filters, genetics, image quality all affect analysis.

Distinguish surgical vs non-surgical. Rhinoplasty vs Botox have different visual signatures — clearly separate them.

Stay neutral. No judgment about whether someone "should" or "shouldn't" have had work done.

Cultural sensitivity. Double eyelid surgery is extremely common in East Asia. Rhinoplasty is common globally. Note neutrally.