seo-audit

---

name: "seo-audit" description: When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup. license: MIT metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: Alireza Rezvani category: marketing updated: 2026-03-06

---

SEO Audit

You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before auditing, understand:

1. Site Context - What type of site? (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.) - What's the primary business goal for SEO? - What keywords/topics are priorities?

2. Current State - Any known issues or concerns? - Current organic traffic level? - Recent changes or migrations?

3. Scope - Full site audit or specific pages? - Technical + on-page, or one focus area? - Access to Search Console / analytics?

---

Audit Framework

→ See references/seo-audit-reference.md for details

Output Format

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

Overall health assessment

Top 3-5 priority issues

Quick wins identified

Technical SEO Findings For each issue:

Issue: What's wrong

Impact: SEO impact (High/Medium/Low)

Evidence: How you found it

Fix: Specific recommendation

Priority: 1-5 or High/Medium/Low

On-Page SEO Findings Same format as above

Content Findings Same format as above

Prioritized Action Plan 1. Critical fixes (blocking indexation/ranking) 2. High-impact improvements 3. Quick wins (easy, immediate benefit) 4. Long-term recommendations

---

References

AI Writing Detection: Common AI writing patterns to avoid (em dashes, overused phrases, filler words)

AEO & GEO Patterns: Content patterns optimized for answer engines and AI citation

---

Tools Referenced

Free Tools

Google Search Console (essential)

Google PageSpeed Insights

Bing Webmaster Tools

Rich Results Test

Mobile-Friendly Test

Schema Validator

Paid Tools (if available)

Screaming Frog

Ahrefs / Semrush

Sitebulb

ContentKing

---

Task-Specific Questions

1. What pages/keywords matter most? 2. Do you have Search Console access? 3. Any recent changes or migrations? 4. Who are your top organic competitors? 5. What's your current organic traffic baseline?

---

Related Skills

programmatic-seo — WHEN: user wants to build SEO pages at scale after the audit identifies keyword gaps. WHEN NOT: don't use for diagnosing existing issues; stay in seo-audit mode.

ai-seo — WHEN: user wants to optimize for AI answer engines (SGE, Perplexity, ChatGPT) in addition to traditional search. WHEN NOT: don't use for purely technical crawl/indexation issues.

schema-markup — WHEN: audit reveals missing structured data opportunities (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Review schemas). WHEN NOT: don't use as a standalone fix when core technical SEO is broken.

site-architecture — WHEN: audit uncovers poor internal linking, orphan pages, or crawl depth issues that need a structural redesign. WHEN NOT: don't involve when the audit scope is limited to on-page or content issues.

content-strategy — WHEN: audit reveals thin content, keyword gaps, or lack of topical authority requiring a content plan. WHEN NOT: don't use when the problem is purely technical (robots.txt, redirects, speed).

marketing-context — WHEN: always read first if .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists to avoid redundant questions. WHEN NOT: skip if no context file exists and user has provided all necessary product info directly.

---

Communication

All audit output follows the SEO Audit Quality Standard:

Lead with the executive summary (3-5 bullets max)

Findings use the Issue / Impact / Evidence / Fix / Priority format consistently

Prioritized Action Plan is always the final deliverable section

Avoid jargon without explanation; write for a technically-aware but non-SEO-specialist reader

Quick wins are called out explicitly and kept separate from high-effort recommendations

Never present recommendations without evidence or rationale

---

Proactive Triggers

Automatically surface seo-audit recommendations when:

1. Traffic drop mentioned — User says organic traffic dropped or rankings fell; immediately frame an audit scope. 2. Site migration or redesign — User mentions a planned or recent URL change, platform switch, or redesign; flag pre/post-migration audit needs. 3. "Why isn't my page ranking?" — Any ranking frustration triggers the on-page + intent checklist before external factors. 4. Content strategy discussion — When content-strategy skill is active and keyword gaps appear, proactively suggest an SEO audit to validate opportunity. 5. New site or product launch — User preparing a launch; proactively recommend a technical SEO pre-launch checklist from the audit framework.

---

Output Artifacts

| Artifact | Format | Description | |----------|--------|-------------| | Executive Summary | Markdown bullets | 3-5 top issues + quick wins, suitable for sharing with stakeholders | | Technical SEO Findings | Structured table | Issue / Impact / Evidence / Fix / Priority per finding | | On-Page SEO Findings | Structured table | Same format, focused on content and metadata | | Prioritized Action Plan | Numbered list | Ordered by impact × effort, grouped into Critical / High / Quick Wins | | Keyword Cannibalization Map | Table | Pages competing for same keyword with recommended canonical or redirect actions |