🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter Guide β€” Subscribe β†’
BytesAgainBytesAgain
πŸ¦€ ClawHub

Dagster Pipeline Analyzer

by @charlie-morrison

Analyze Dagster pipelines and software-defined assets for quality, scheduling, partitioning, IO managers, resource configuration, and observability. Checks a...

TERMINAL
clawhub install dagster-pipeline-analyzer

πŸ“– About This Skill


name: cm-dagster-pipeline-analyzer description: Analyze Dagster pipelines and software-defined assets for quality, scheduling, partitioning, IO managers, resource configuration, and observability. Checks asset dependencies, freshness policies, group structure, sensor/schedule configuration, and operational best practices. Use when asked to review Dagster code, audit asset graphs, check Dagster best practices, analyze partition strategies, review IO managers, or optimize Dagster deployments. Triggers on "dagster", "software-defined assets", "dagster assets", "dagster pipeline", "dagster schedule", "dagster sensor", "dagster partition", "io manager", "dagster resources", "dagster ops", "dagster jobs", "asset graph". metadata: tags: ["dagster", "data-engineering", "orchestration", "pipeline", "assets", "partitioning", "scheduling", "data-platform", "etl", "observability"]

Dagster Pipeline Analyzer

Analyze Dagster software-defined assets and pipelines for quality, reliability, and operational excellence. Reviews asset dependency graphs, freshness policies, partitioning strategies, IO managers, resources, sensors/schedules, and observability gaps. Acts as a senior data platform engineer auditing your Dagster deployment.

Usage

Basic: Analyze the Dagster project in /path/to/dagster/ Focused: Check asset freshness policies | Analyze partition strategies | Review IO manager configuration | Find assets without observability metadata

How It Works

Step 1: Discover Dagster Definitions

find /path/to/project -name "definitions.py" -o -name "repository.py"
find /path/to/project -name "*.py" -path "*/assets/*"
find /path/to/project -name "*.py" -path "*/sensors/*" -o -path "*/schedules/*"
cat /path/to/project/dagster.yaml /path/to/project/workspace.yaml 2>/dev/null

Parses @asset, @multi_asset, @op, @graph, @job, ConfigurableResource, ConfigurableIOManager, @schedule, @sensor, and partition definitions.

Step 2: Audit Asset Graph Structure

Asset Graph: 34 assets, 5 groups (raw, staging, warehouse, analytics, ml)
Max depth: 7 | External assets: 3 | Source assets: 4

[source] s3_raw_events -> raw_events -> cleaned_events -> event_aggregates -> daily_metrics -> churn_features -> churn_model

FAIL: "orphan_transform" has no downstream consumers Last materialized 49 days ago. Remove or document purpose.

FAIL: "daily_metrics" depends on 6 upstream assets β€” fragile bottleneck If any upstream fails, materialization blocked. RECOMMEND: Add retry logic or partial materialization support

FAIL: No @asset_check defined for any asset RECOMMEND: Add row count, null checks, freshness, schema validation

Step 3: Review Freshness Policies

  Assets WITH freshness policy: 8/34 (24%)

FAIL: "daily_revenue" β€” no freshness policy on business-critical metric FIX: FreshnessPolicy(maximum_lag_minutes=120)

FAIL: Freshness SLA cascade violation: "event_aggregates" has 60-min freshness but upstream "cleaned_events" takes ~20 min to materialize Effective budget: 10 min. Actual avg: 25 min. SLA violated regularly. FIX: Relax to 90 min or speed up materialization

WARN: "user_segments" has 1440-min (24h) freshness but downstream "real_time_recommendations" expects fresh data FIX: Tighten to maximum_lag_minutes=60

Step 4: Analyze Partitioning

  "raw_events": DailyPartitionsDefinition β€” PASS, matches data pattern
  "event_aggregates": MonthlyPartitionsDefinition
    WARN: Upstream is daily β€” verify TimeWindowPartitionMapping
  "ml_features": Unpartitioned, processes 2M+ rows every run (45 min)
    FAIL: Add DailyPartitionsDefinition for incremental processing (~3 min/partition)

FAIL: No BackfillPolicy on any partitioned asset Risk: Accidental backfill of 486 partitions = 486 concurrent runs FIX: BackfillPolicy(max_partitions_per_run=10)

Step 5: Review IO Managers

  Configured: "io_manager" (Filesystem), "warehouse_io" (Snowflake), "s3_io" (S3Pickle)

FAIL: Default is FilesystemIOManager β€” data lost on pod restart FIX: Set default to S3/GCS/database-backed store

FAIL: S3PickleIOManager β€” not portable, security risk (arbitrary code exec) FIX: Switch to S3ParquetIOManager for schema enforcement + compression

WARN: No return type annotations β€” IO manager cannot validate schema FIX: @asset def daily_metrics(...) -> pd.DataFrame:

Coverage: warehouse_io 35%, s3_io 24%, filesystem 41% (concern)

Step 6: Audit Resources

  FAIL: snowflake_password="..." in definitions.py line 42
    FIX: Use EnvVar("SNOWFLAKE_PASSWORD")

FAIL: Resource "spark" defined but never used β€” remove it

WARN: Resource "dbt" has hardcoded project path FIX: Use EnvVar or relative path

WARN: No resource-level health checks at startup

Step 7: Review Schedules and Sensors

  FAIL: "daily_etl" uses cron but assets have DailyPartitionsDefinition
    FIX: build_schedule_from_partitions() for auto-alignment

FAIL: "s3_file_sensor" polls every 30s β€” high API cost, rate limit risk FIX: minimum_interval_seconds=300 or SQS/SNS event-driven

FAIL: "freshness_sensor" has no error handling β€” crashes sensor daemon FIX: Wrap in try/except, return SkipReason on failure

WARN: 14 assets have no automation β€” manual-only materialization WARN: No @asset_sensor for cross-job dependency coordination

Step 8: Check Observability

  FAIL: 22/34 assets have no description
  FAIL: No MaterializeResult metadata (no row counts, schema, quality)
    FIX: yield MaterializeResult(metadata={"row_count": len(df), ...})
  FAIL: No asset checks defined
  WARN: No code_version on any asset β€” always re-materializes
  WARN: No owners defined β€” alerts not routable

Coverage: descriptions 35%, freshness 24%, code_version 0%, checks 0%, metadata 15%, owners 0%

Step 9: Final Report

# Dagster Pipeline Analysis Report

Overall Health Score: 51/100

Asset graph: 7/10 Freshness: 4/10 Partitioning: 5/10 IO managers: 4/10 Resources: 5/10 Schedules/sensors: 5/10 Observability: 3/10 Security: 4/10 Documentation: 3/10

Critical Issues

1. Credentials hardcoded in definitions.py 2. Default IO manager is local filesystem β€” data loss risk 3. Pickle serialization β€” security + portability risk 4. No asset checks β€” data quality issues undetected 5. No backfill safety β€” accidental mass materialization risk

High Priority

6. 76% assets have no freshness policy 7. S3 sensor polling every 30s 8. No materialization metadata 9. Freshness SLA cascade violation 10. 14 assets with no automation

Output

  • Asset graph visualization with dependency depth, bottlenecks, orphans
  • Freshness analysis with SLA cascade validation
  • Partition audit covering strategy review and backfill safety
  • IO manager review for serialization, durability, consistency
  • Resource/schedule/sensor audit with security and config checks
  • Observability gaps for metadata, checks, documentation coverage
  • Health score 0-100 with per-category breakdown and remediation code
  • Tips for Best Results

  • Point the agent at your Dagster project root directory
  • Include dagster.yaml and workspace.yaml for deployment context
  • Provide Dagster version for version-appropriate recommendations
  • Run before major asset graph changes or quarterly as a health check
  • πŸ’‘ Examples

    Basic: Analyze the Dagster project in /path/to/dagster/ Focused: Check asset freshness policies | Analyze partition strategies | Review IO manager configuration | Find assets without observability metadata