Deep Research Suite
by @aptratcn
Deep Research Suite - One command to aggregate, analyze, and synthesize research from multiple sources. Search → Extract → Summarize → Report.
clawhub install deep-research-suite📖 About This Skill
name: deep-research-suite version: 1.0.0 description: Deep Research Suite - One command to aggregate, analyze, and synthesize research from multiple sources. Search → Extract → Summarize → Report. emoji: 🔬 tags: [research, automation, productivity, analysis, ai-agent]
Deep Research Suite 🔬
One command to aggregate, analyze, and synthesize research from multiple sources.
What It Does
Input: "Research AI agent memory management trends 2026"Output:
1. Search 5+ sources
2. Extract key findings
3. Identify patterns
4. Generate structured report
5. Save to file for reference
Research Pipeline
Stage 1: Multi-Source Search
Sources to check:
Web search (general)
GitHub (code/examples)
Hacker News (discussions)
ArXiv (papers, if relevant)
Reddit (community opinions)
News sites (recent articles)
Stage 2: Content Extraction
For each source:
1. Fetch content
2. Extract main points
3. Identify key facts/statistics
4. Note source credibility
5. Tag by topic relevance
Stage 3: Synthesis
Combine findings:
Group by theme
Identify consensus views
Note contradictions
Highlight emerging trends
Flag outdated info
Stage 4: Report Generation
Output format:Research Report: [Topic]
Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Sources: X sources analyzedExecutive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview]Key Findings
Trend 1: [Name]
Source: X, Y, Z
Evidence: ...
Implications: ... Trend 2: [Name]
...Contradictions / Debates
View A says: ... (Source: X)
View B says: ... (Source: Y)
Assessment: ... Actionable Insights
1. ...
2. ...Sources
Source 1 - relevance: high
Source 2 - relevance: medium
Usage Examples
Quick Research
User: "What's new in LLM context window management?"Agent:
[Searching 5 sources...]
[Extracting key findings...]
[Synthesizing...]
LLM Context Window Management - 2026 Update
Key Trends
1. Dynamic Context Sizing - Models now auto-adjust context based on task complexity
2. Semantic Chunking - Replace fixed-size chunks with meaning-based segments
3. Context Compression - 10x compression with minimal info loss[Full report saved to memory/research/llm-context-2026-04-21.md]
Deep Dive
User: "Deep research on AI agent subagent architecture patterns"Agent:
[This will take 5-10 minutes for comprehensive analysis]
Stage 1/4: Multi-source search...
GitHub: 15 repos found
Papers: 3 relevant
Discussions: 12 threads Stage 2/4: Content extraction...
Analyzing top 10 GitHub repos...
Extracting paper findings...
Summarizing discussions... Stage 3/4: Synthesis...
Identified 4 architecture patterns
Found 2 debates
3 emerging trends Stage 4/4: Report generation...
[Report saved to memory/research/subagent-architecture-2026-04-21.md]
Competitive Analysis
User: "Compare popular AI agent memory solutions"Agent:
[Generating comparison matrix...]
| Solution | Approach | Pros | Cons | Stars |
|----------|----------|------|------|-------|
| Mem0 | Persistent memory | Easy integration | Limited context | 25k |
| Letta | Stateful agents | Full state | Complex setup | 15k |
| LangGraph | Graph memory | Flexible | Learning curve | 100k |
[Full comparison saved to memory/research/memory-solutions-comparison.md]
Output Files
All research saved to memory/research/:
memory/research/
├── llm-context-2026-04-21.md
├── subagent-architecture-2026-04-21.md
└── memory-solutions-comparison.md
Integration with Other Skills
Anti-Patterns
❌ Don't rely on single source ❌ Don't skip source credibility check ❌ Don't present outdated info as current ❌ Don't fabricate sources or statistics
License
MIT