🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter Guide β€” Subscribe β†’
BytesAgainBytesAgain
πŸ¦€ ClawHub

Humanizer Enhanced

by @dorukardahan

Advanced AI text humanizer for blog content. Detects and removes 34 AI writing patterns, adds personality/soul, and handles crypto/Web3 specific tells. Use w...

Versionv1.0.0
Downloads1,916
Installs4
TERMINAL
clawhub install humanizer-enhanced

πŸ“– About This Skill


name: humanizer-enhanced description: | Advanced AI text humanizer for blog content. Detects and removes 34 AI writing patterns, adds personality/soul, and handles crypto/Web3 specific tells. Use when user says /humanizer, "humanize this", "remove AI patterns", "make it sound human", or asks to clean up blog posts, articles, or drafts. Features: 28 base patterns from Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing", 6 crypto/Web3 specific patterns, severity scoring (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), stat attribution fixer, soul/personality injection, batch mode. metadata: version: 1.2.0 author: 0G Labs content team

Humanizer enhanced: remove AI writing patterns

Identify and remove signs of AI-generated text. This enhanced version includes crypto/Web3 patterns and adds personality to make content sound genuinely human-written.

Quick start

/humanizer                    # Humanize current file or selection
/humanizer path/to/file.md    # Humanize specific file
/humanizer --scan             # Scan only, don't edit (show issues)
/humanizer --batch drafts/    # Process all .md files in directory


Process

Step 1: Scan for patterns

Identify all AI patterns in the text, categorize by severity:

  • HIGH β€” Obvious AI tells, must fix (negative parallelism, chatbot artifacts, em dash overuse, vague attributions, copula avoidance)
  • MEDIUM β€” Common AI patterns, should fix (rule of three, significance inflation, synonym cycling)
  • LOW β€” Minor tells, fix if time permits (title case headings, excessive bold)
  • Step 2: Report findings

    Show user a summary:

    ## Humanizer scan results

    HIGH (3 issues)

  • Line 45: Negative parallelism "isn't X. It's Y"
  • Line 89: Em dash overuse (5 instances)
  • Line 120: "Research shows" without attribution
  • MEDIUM (5 issues)

  • Line 23: Rule of three pattern
  • Line 67: Copula avoidance "serves as"
  • ...

    LOW (2 issues)

  • Line 12: Title case heading
  • ...

    Total: 10 issues found Estimated humanization: ~15 edits needed

    Step 3: Fix (with user approval)

    Ask user: "Fix all issues? Or review one by one?"

    Step 4: Add soul

    After fixing patterns, review for personality. Sterile writing is still obvious AI. See references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md for the full soul/personality guide.

    Step 5: Readability check

    Check Flesch-Kincaid readability. Target grade 10-12 for developer content, grade 8-10 for general audience. If score is too high (too complex), simplify longest sentences and replace jargon.

    Step 6: Em dash regression scan

    After all other fixes, run a final check for em dashes (β€”) across the text. Humanizer rewrites can reintroduce em dashes. Remove any that were added during the fix process.


    Pattern routing table

    All 34 patterns are documented with before/after examples in the reference files below.

    | Patterns | Severity | Reference file | |----------|----------|----------------| | 1. Significance inflation | MEDIUM | references/content-patterns.md | | 2. Promotional language | MEDIUM | references/content-patterns.md | | 3. Superficial -ing analyses | MEDIUM | references/content-patterns.md | | 4. Vague attributions | HIGH | references/content-patterns.md | | 5. Formulaic challenges sections | MEDIUM | references/content-patterns.md | | 6. Generic positive conclusions | MEDIUM | references/content-patterns.md | | 7. AI vocabulary words | MEDIUM | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 8. Copula avoidance | HIGH | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 9. Negative parallelism | HIGH | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 10. Rule of three | MEDIUM | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 11. Synonym cycling | MEDIUM | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 12. False ranges | LOW | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 13. Em dash overuse | HIGH | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 14. Excessive boldface | LOW | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 15. Inline-header lists | MEDIUM | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 16. Title case headings | LOW | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 17. Curly quotes | LOW | references/language-style-patterns.md | | 18. Chatbot artifacts | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 19. Knowledge cutoff disclaimers | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 20. Sycophantic tone | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 21. Excessive hedging | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 22. Filler phrases | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 23. Crypto hype language | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 24. Vague "ecosystem" claims | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 25. Unsubstantiated stats | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 26. "Seamless" and "frictionless" | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 27. Abstract "empowerment" language | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 28. Fake decentralization claims | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 29. Meta-narration | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 30. False audience range | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 31. Parenthetical definitions | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 32. Sequential numbering | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 33. "It's worth noting" filler | MEDIUM | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | 34. Identical paragraph structure | HIGH | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md | | Soul and personality guide | β€” | references/communication-crypto-soul-patterns.md |


    Severity reference

    | Severity | Patterns | Action | |----------|----------|--------| | HIGH | Negative parallelism, em dash overuse, chatbot artifacts, vague attributions, copula avoidance, crypto hype, unsubstantiated stats, meta-narration, identical paragraph structure, fake decentralization, knowledge cutoff disclaimers | Must fix | | MEDIUM | Rule of three, significance inflation, promotional language, -ing analyses, AI vocabulary, sycophantic tone, hedging, filler phrases, ecosystem claims, false audience range, parenthetical definitions, sequential numbering, "it's worth noting" filler, inline-header lists, "seamless"/"frictionless", abstract empowerment | Should fix | | LOW | Title case, curly quotes, excessive bold, false ranges | Fix if time permits |


    Quick reference: find and replace

    | Find | Replace | |------|---------| | β€” (em dash, multiple) | , or . | | serves as / stands as | is | | isn't X. It's Y | Rewrite as single statement | | crucial / vital / pivotal | important or key or delete | | Furthermore, / Moreover, | Also, or delete | | It is important to note | Delete | | Research shows | Add specific source | | landscape (abstract) | Be specific | | revolutionizing / game-changing | Describe what it actually does | | seamless / frictionless | Describe the actual UX | | In this article, we'll explore | Delete | | Let's dive in / Let's take a look | Delete | | First,... Second,... Third,... | Vary transitions | | It's worth noting / Notably, | Delete | | delve | "look at" / "examine" | | Additionally | Delete |


    Batch mode

    To humanize multiple files:

    # Scan all markdown files in drafts/
    /humanizer --scan drafts/*.md

    Fix all files (with confirmation)

    /humanizer --batch drafts/

    Output format for batch:

    ## Batch humanization report

    drafts/post-1.md HIGH 3 | MEDIUM 5 | LOW 2

    drafts/post-2.md HIGH 1 | MEDIUM 3 | LOW 4

    drafts/post-3.md Clean! No issues found.

    Total: 3 files, 18 issues


    Sources

    Based on:

  • Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing
  • GitHub: blader/humanizer
  • Original research on crypto/Web3 AI patterns
  • Key insight: "LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely result that applies to the widest variety of cases."


    *Version 1.2.0 | Created for 0G Labs content team*

    πŸ’‘ Examples

    /humanizer                    # Humanize current file or selection
    /humanizer path/to/file.md    # Humanize specific file
    /humanizer --scan             # Scan only, don't edit (show issues)
    /humanizer --batch drafts/    # Process all .md files in directory