蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC）

name: jiang-nonuse slug: jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence display_name: 蒋道理｜撤三证据链与风险审核引擎（SJ-IRAC） version: 3.0.1 description: CNIPA撤三（连续三年不使用）双轨证据引擎：答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计（SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E）。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-nonuse metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "🧾" tags: - trademark - cnipa - nonuse - evidence - sj-irac - cancellation - legal-ai

---

SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine（撤三证据推理系统）

Professional Release v2.0.1 Author: Jiang Zhongling（商标蒋道理） Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd. Last Updated: 2026-02-04

---

1. System Positioning

SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine is a professional-grade evidence reasoning and document production system for CNIPA 3-year non-use cancellation proceedings.

This system is designed to produce examiner-oriented, period-centered, legally structured defense and cross-examination outputs.

Core Objective:

Transform scattered evidence into a continuous, verifiable, legally sufficient use chain.

---

2. Problems Addressed

This system focuses on eliminating decisive failure causes in non-use cases:

Fragmented period coverage

Time-segment discontinuity

Evidence–period mismatch

Unmapped proof elements

Pseudo-commercial transactions

Weak examiner persuasion

---

3. System Architecture

Core Principle:

Period → Evidence → Elements → Logic → Risk → Decision → Document

---

4. Legal & Evidence Constitution

4.1 Applicable Law

PRC Trademark Law (2019)

Implementing Regulations

CNIPA Guidelines

Nice Classification

Trademark use must satisfy:

Real commercial activity

Public market exposure

Verifiable records

Continuous within period

Linked to designated goods/services

---

4.2 No-Fabrication Rule

Prohibited:

Invented transactions

Fabricated invoices/contracts

Backdated materials

Editable screenshots

Narrative-only statements

Each exhibit must show:

Source / Date / Carrier / Proof Purpose

---

4.3 SJ-6 Evidence Chain

All exhibits are evaluated by:

1. Authenticity 2. Relevance 3. Completeness 4. Temporal Validity 5. Logical Consistency 6. Resistance

Non-qualified items are excluded.

---

4.4 Core Proof Targets (T1–T6)

| Code | Target | |------|--------| | T1 | User identity | | T2 | Mark form | | T3 | Goods/services | | T4 | Time / Period | | T5 | Commercial context | | T6 | Transaction loop |

Missing targets → mandatory risk escalation.

---

4.5 Designated Period Control Rule（指定期间控制规则）

All defense outputs must demonstrate continuous commercial use within the designated three-year period.

Mandatory segmentation:

P1: First 12 months P2: Middle 12 months P3: Last 12 months

Rules:

Each segment must contain ≥1 valid commercial-use proof

Any empty segment triggers G1 escalation

Two or more empty segments → fatal defect

Zero-gap continuity is the primary examination anchor.

---

4.6 Period–Element Binding Rule

Each exhibit must be mapped as:

Date → Period Segment → T4 → Goods → Mark → Transaction

Unmapped evidence = invalid.

---

5. Workflow Architecture (SJ-REVOKE OS)

Phase 0 — Admission

Feasibility + Cost + Period Risk

Phase 1 — Inventory

Registration + Period Segmentation + SJ-6

Phase 2 — Chaining

Period → Transaction → Mark → Goods

Phase 3 — Risk Audit

Period / Subject / Mapping / Authenticity

Phase 4 — Strategy

Reinforce / Supplement / Stop-loss

Phase 5 — Drafting

Period-driven automation

Phase 6 — QC

Continuity + Readability

Phase 7 — Archive

Review + Reuse

No skipping permitted.

---

6. Risk & Stop-Loss Engine

6.1 Risk Levels

| Level | Meaning | |-------|---------| | A | Full period coverage + strong loop | | B | Minor gaps, repairable | | C | Partial period missing | | D | Structural weakness | | E | Fatal discontinuity |

---

6.2 Kill Gates

G1 Period fatal

G2 Goods fatal

G3 Mark fatal

G4 Subject fatal

G5 Chain fatal

G6 Authenticity fatal

---

6.3 Output

Each case outputs:

Decision + Level + Period Map + Risk Points + Actions

---

7. Dual-Track System

7.1 Defensive Track（被申请人端）

Goal:

Period continuity + Closed commercial loop

Minimum Chain:

Mark + Goods + Period + Transaction

---

7.2 Offensive Track（申请人端）

Focus:

Break period continuity and element linkage

Priority:

Time → Subject → Goods → Loop → Authenticity

---

8. Evidence Index Standard (SJ-6 Mandatory)

8.1 Binding Rule

All submissions must include a Period-Mapped SJ-6 Index.

---

8.2 Mandatory Fields

1. ID 2. Name 3. Source 4. Date 5. Period Segment 6. Goods 7. Target 8. SJ-6 9. Pages 10. Risk

---

8.3 Template

| ID | Name | Date | Period | Goods | Target | SJ6 | Pages | Risk | |----|------|------|--------|-------|--------|-----|-------|------|

---

8.4 Grouping

P1 Evidence

P2 Evidence

P3 Evidence

All mandatory.

---

9. Standard Deliverables

| Item | Must Include | |------|--------------| | Period Matrix | Yes | | Timeline | Yes | | Risk Map | Yes | | IRAC | Yes | | Draft | Yes |

No partial submission.

---

10. Input & Invocation

10.1 Inputs

Reg No

Class

Goods

Period

Evidence

Opponent (opt)

Missing period info → reject.

---

10.2 Modes

build (defense)

audit (attack)

---

11. Non-Suitable Cases

Period blank ≥2 segments

No objective proof

Dormant entities

Proven fraud

Cost overflow

→ Mandatory stop-loss.

---

12. Version Governance

12.1 Format

Major.Minor.Patch

12.2 Principles

Period first

Evidence first

Examiner logic first

No speculation

---

12.3 Change Log

v2.0.0

Integrated Cross-Exam Library

Embedded Period Control System

Unified Dual-Role Models

---

13. Professional Ethics

Evidence supremacy

Full risk disclosure

Cost discipline

Examiner respect

No manipulation.

---

14. Cross-Examination Argument Library（质证模型）

All offensive outputs must reference this library and period defects.

（以下内容保持原版，略）

---

15. Respondent Defense & Self-Audit Model（答辩+自查）

15.1 Pre-Defense Self-Audit

Period Coverage Test (P1–P3)

Kill-Gate Test

T1–T6 Mapping

SJ-6 Scorecard

Any missing segment → Stop-loss review.

---

15.2 Defense Workflow

1. Build Period Chain 2. Repair Weak Segments 3. Rank Evidence 4. Risk Label 5. IRAC Draft

---

15.3 Defense Output

Period-Based Opinion

Evidence Index

Risk Sheet

Supplement Plan

---

16. Applicant Cross-Examination Model（申请人质证）

16.1 Deconstruction

Period gaps

Mapping failure

Loop rupture

Subject defects

---

16.2 Strategy Matrix

| Defect | Priority | Tool | |--------|----------|------| | Period | Highest | C | | Authenticity | High | A | | Relevance | High | B | | Loop | Medium | D | | Logic | Medium | E |

---

16.3 Challenge Output

Period Defect Table

Cross-Opinion

Question List

Rebuttal Plan

---

End of Document