Uniswap Lp Strategy

---

name: lp-strategy description: Comprehensive LP strategy comparison for a token pair — evaluates all versions, fee tiers, range widths, and rebalance approaches side-by-side with APY, IL, gas costs, and risk ratings. Use when the user wants to compare LP options or see a detailed analysis of all strategies. model: opus allowed-tools: [Task(subagent_type:lp-strategist), Task(subagent_type:pool-researcher)]

---

LP Strategy Comparison

Overview

Produces a comprehensive, multi-strategy comparison for LP positions on a token pair. Unlike optimize-lp which gives a single recommendation, this skill presents all viable strategies side-by-side with detailed pros/cons, enabling the user to make an informed decision.

This is the "deep dive" version — use when the user wants to understand all their options, not just the top pick.

When to Use

Activate when the user asks:

"Compare LP strategies for ETH/USDC"

"What are my options for LPing into X/Y?"

"Detailed LP analysis for WETH/USDC"

"Show me all fee tiers for this pair"

"V2 vs V3 vs V4 comparison for X/Y"

"Give me a full breakdown of LP options"

"I want to understand the tradeoffs before LPing"

Parameters

| Parameter | Required | Default | How to Extract | | ---------- | -------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | token0 | Yes | — | First token | | token1 | Yes | — | Second token | | capital | No | — | Amount available for LP | | chain | No | All chains | Specific chain or "all" for cross-chain comparison| | strategies | No | All | Specific strategies to compare (usually "all") |

Workflow

1. Extract parameters from the user's request.

2. Delegate to pool-researcher: First, get a full pool comparison across all fee tiers and versions via Task(subagent_type:pool-researcher). This provides the data foundation (TVL, volume, APY per pool).

3. Delegate to lp-strategist: Invoke Task(subagent_type:lp-strategist) in comprehensive comparison mode. The agent evaluates every viable combination: - V2 full-range (passive) - V3 narrow range per fee tier - V3 medium range per fee tier - V3 wide range per fee tier - V4 options (if available) - Cross-chain opportunities (if chain="all")

4. Present comparison table with all strategies ranked and annotated with pros/cons.

Output Format

LP Strategy Comparison: WETH/USDC
  Pair Type: Stable-Volatile (moderate volatility)
  Best Overall: V3 0.05%, Medium Range (see row 2 below)
  ┌────┬──────────────────┬────────┬──────────┬───────┬──────────┬──────────┬────────┐
  │ #  │ Strategy         │ Chain  │ Fee APY  │ IL    │ Net APY  │ Rebal.   │ Risk   │
  ├────┼──────────────────┼────────┼──────────┼───────┼──────────┼──────────┼────────┤
  │ 1  │ V3 0.05% Narrow  │ ETH    │ 35%      │ -12%  │ 23%      │ Weekly   │ HIGH   │
  │ 2  │ V3 0.05% Medium  │ ETH    │ 21%      │ -6%   │ 15%      │ Bi-weekly│ MEDIUM │
  │ 3  │ V3 0.05% Wide    │ ETH    │ 12%      │ -2%   │ 10%      │ Monthly  │ LOW    │
  │ 4  │ V3 0.30% Medium  │ ETH    │ 8%       │ -6%   │ 2%       │ Bi-weekly│ MEDIUM │
  │ 5  │ V3 0.05% Medium  │ Base   │ 18%      │ -5%   │ 13%      │ Bi-weekly│ MEDIUM │
  │ 6  │ V2 0.30% Full    │ ETH    │ 4%       │ -1%   │ 3%       │ Never    │ LOW    │
  └────┴──────────────────┴────────┴──────────┴───────┴──────────┴──────────┴────────┘
  Strategy Details:
  #1 V3 0.05% Narrow (±5%) — HIGH RISK, HIGH REWARD
    Pros: Highest fee capture, maximum capital efficiency
    Cons: Frequent rebalancing ($15/rebalance on mainnet), high IL risk
    Best for: Active managers with >$10K positions
    Gas warning: Break-even ~3 days per rebalance
  #2 V3 0.05% Medium (±15%) — RECOMMENDED
    Pros: Strong APY with manageable rebalancing, 80%+ time-in-range
    Cons: Moderate IL during large moves
    Best for: Most LPs with $1K+ positions
    Gas warning: Break-even ~1 day per rebalance
  #3 V3 0.05% Wide (±50%) — LOW MAINTENANCE
    Pros: Rarely needs rebalancing, low IL, almost passive
    Cons: Lower capital efficiency, lower APY
    Best for: Passive LPs, small positions where gas matters
  #6 V2 0.30% Full Range — SET AND FORGET
    Pros: Zero maintenance, no range management, battle-tested
    Cons: Lowest returns, less capital efficient
    Best for: First-time LPs, long-term holders who don't want to manage
  Ready to proceed? Choose a strategy and say "Add liquidity with strategy #2"

Important Notes

This skill produces analysis, not execution. To act on a strategy, use manage-liquidity.

Net APY = Fee APY - Expected IL. Always show both components.

Gas costs for rebalancing are factored into the comparison for each chain.

Cross-chain comparison (when chain="all") highlights L2 gas advantages.

The lp-strategist internally uses pool-researcher for data and risk-assessor for risk evaluation.

Error Handling

| Error | User-Facing Message | Suggested Action | | -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | | Token not found | "Could not find token X." | Provide contract address | | No pools exist | "No pools found for X/Y." | Try different tokens or chain | | Insufficient data | "Not enough data for a reliable comparison." | Pool may be too new | | Agent unavailable | "LP strategist is not available." | Check agent configuration |