🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter GuideSubscribe →
BytesAgainBytesAgain
🦀 ClawHub

Microservices

by @clawkk

Deep microservices workflow—service boundaries, data ownership, synchronous vs async integration, contracts, deployment independence, and operational complex...

Versionv1.0.0
Downloads846
TERMINAL
clawhub install microservices

📖 About This Skill


name: microservices description: Deep microservices workflow—service boundaries, data ownership, synchronous vs async integration, contracts, deployment independence, and operational complexity. Use when splitting a monolith, reviewing service boundaries, or debugging distributed failures.

Microservices (Deep Workflow)

Microservices trade code simplicity for operational and contract complexity. Justify each boundary with ownership and data isolation—not fashion.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • Splitting the monolith; coupling blocks independent deploys
  • Latency cascades, partial failures, contract breaks
  • Conway’s law alignment between teams and services
  • Initial offer:

    Use six stages: (1) goals & constraints, (2) boundaries & data ownership, (3) integration patterns, (4) contracts & versioning, (5) reliability patterns, (6) ops & governance). Confirm org maturity and platform capabilities.


    Stage 1: Goals & Constraints

    Goal: Why not a modular monolith first?

    Valid drivers

  • Independent deploy cadence per team
  • Different scaling profiles or stacks
  • Clear domain ownership and blast-radius isolation
  • Costs

  • Distributed transactions, harder debugging, broader test matrix
  • Exit condition: Explicit assumption that modular monolith was considered.


    Stage 2: Boundaries & Data Ownership

    Goal: One service owns each aggregate’s write path; no shared writable tables across services.

    Practices

  • Bounded contexts from DDD when helpful
  • Exit condition: Entity → owning service map.


    Stage 3: Integration Patterns

    Goal: Sync HTTP/gRPC vs async events—match consistency needs.

    Patterns

  • Sagas or outbox for multi-step business processes
  • Exit condition: Sequence diagrams for top three flows.


    Stage 4: Contracts & Versioning

    Goal: Backward-compatible evolution; consumer-driven contracts optional.

    Practices

  • Deprecation policy published

  • Stage 5: Reliability Patterns

    Goal: Timeouts, retries with backoff, circuit breakers, bulkheads; idempotent handlers for retries.


    Stage 6: Ops & Governance

    Goal: Service catalog, SLIs on dependency edges, golden paths for new services.


    Final Review Checklist

  • [ ] Boundary and data ownership clear
  • [ ] Integration style matches consistency needs
  • [ ] Contract versioning policy exists
  • [ ] Reliability patterns applied at boundaries
  • [ ] Ops ownership and catalog in place
  • Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Microservices without delivery maturity often fail—say so explicitly.
  • Shared databases are hidden coupling—flag them.
  • The network is not reliable—design for partial failure.
  • Handling Deviations

  • Small teams: strong bias toward modular monolith or few services.