🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter GuideSubscribe →
BytesAgainBytesAgain
🦀 ClawHub

Olo Market Intelligence

by @aniebyl

Competitive landscape and market intelligence for M&A due diligence — TAM/SAM/SOM, competitor mapping, and industry analysis

Versionv1.0.0
Downloads691
Installs2
TERMINAL
clawhub install olo-market-intelligence

📖 About This Skill


name: olo-market-intelligence version: 1.0.0 description: Competitive landscape and market intelligence for M&A due diligence — TAM/SAM/SOM, competitor mapping, and industry analysis author: ololand.ai author_url: https://ololand.ai license: MIT triggers: - market intelligence - competitive landscape - tam sam som - market sizing - industry analysis - competitor mapping - market research - commercial due diligence tags: - finance - market-research - m-and-a - due-diligence - competitive-intelligence

Market Intelligence for M&A

Deliver competitive landscape analysis and market sizing for acquisition due diligence.

Research Framework

1. Market Sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM)

  • TAM (Total Addressable Market): Global market for the product/service category
  • SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market): Geographic and segment-filtered subset
  • SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market): Realistic share given competitive position
  • Source from industry reports (Gartner, IDC, Statista), triangulate with bottom-up estimates
  • Present as range (low/base/high) with methodology notes
  • Include 5-year CAGR forecast for TAM
  • 2. Competitive Landscape

  • Identify 5-10 direct competitors and 3-5 adjacent players
  • For each competitor, capture:
  • - Revenue estimate and growth rate - Funding history and valuation (if private) - Market share estimate - Key differentiators and positioning - Recent strategic moves (acquisitions, partnerships, product launches)
  • Map competitive positioning on 2x2 matrix (e.g., breadth vs. depth, price vs. capability)
  • 3. Industry Dynamics

  • Growth drivers: Regulatory tailwinds, technology shifts, demand trends
  • Headwinds: Commoditization, regulatory risk, substitute threats
  • Porter's Five Forces assessment:
  • - Supplier power (low/medium/high) - Buyer power (low/medium/high) - Competitive rivalry (low/medium/high) - Threat of substitutes (low/medium/high) - Threat of new entrants (low/medium/high)
  • Industry lifecycle stage: Emerging, Growth, Mature, Declining
  • 4. Customer & Channel Analysis

  • Customer segmentation (enterprise/mid-market/SMB, by vertical)
  • Buyer personas and purchasing decision factors
  • Sales channel mix (direct, channel, marketplace, OEM)
  • Net revenue retention and churn benchmarks for the sector
  • Customer switching costs assessment
  • 5. M&A Activity in Sector

  • Recent comparable transactions (last 3 years)
  • Median and mean EV/Revenue and EV/EBITDA multiples
  • Buyer types (strategic vs. financial sponsor)
  • Deal volume trend (accelerating, stable, declining)
  • Notable failed deals and reasons
  • Output Format

    Market Intelligence Report: [Industry/Sector]
    Target: [Company Name]

    Market Size: TAM: $12.4B (2025) → $18.7B (2030), 8.5% CAGR SAM: $4.2B (North America + Europe) SOM: $180M (target's realistic capture)

    Competitive Position: Market Share: ~4.3% of SAM Rank: #5 of 12 tracked competitors Moat: [proprietary data / switching costs / network effects / none]

    Top Competitors: 1. CompetitorA — $520M rev, 12% share, well-funded 2. CompetitorB — $310M rev, 7% share, PE-backed 3. CompetitorC — $190M rev, 4.5% share, recently acquired

    Industry Health: Growth Stage: Growth → Early Maturity Consolidation Trend: Accelerating (12 deals in last 18 months) Regulatory Climate: Favorable (no pending restrictive legislation)

    Comparable Transactions: Median EV/Revenue: 3.2x Median EV/EBITDA: 14.5x Premium to Public Comps: +25-35% (control premium)

    Quality Standards

  • Cite sources for all market size estimates
  • Distinguish confirmed data from estimates (mark with ~)
  • Date-stamp all competitive intelligence (stale data is dangerous)
  • Flag low-confidence assessments explicitly
  • Cross-reference at least 2 sources for market size claims