Protocol Deviation Classifier
by @ewankeynes
Determine whether an incident in a clinical trial is a "major deviation" or "minor deviation". Function: Automatically classify protocol deviations in clinic...
clawhub install protocol-deviation-classifierπ About This Skill
name: protocol-deviation-classifier description: 'Determine whether an incident in a clinical trial is a "major deviation" or "minor deviation".
Function: Automatically classify protocol deviations in clinical trials based on GCP/ICH E6 standards,
assessing the impact on subject safety, data integrity, and trial scientific validity.
Trigger: When classification assessment of protocol deviations is needed, input deviation event description or deviation type.
Use cases: Clinical trial quality management, deviation impact assessment, regulatory submission preparation, audit preparation.
' version: 1.0.0 category: Pharma tags:
Protocol Deviation Classifier
Clinical trial protocol deviation classification tool, based on GCP and ICH E6 guidelines, automatically determines whether deviations belong to "major deviations" or "minor deviations".
Features
Deviation Classification Standards
Major/Critical Deviation
Deviations that may affect trial data integrity, subject safety, or trial scientific validity:
| Category | Examples | |------|------| | Informed Consent | Performing research procedures without informed consent, using expired/incorrect informed consent forms | | Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria | Enrolling subjects who don't meet inclusion criteria, enrolling subjects who meet exclusion criteria | | Investigational Product | Overdose administration, contraindicated concomitant medication, incorrect route of administration, randomization error | | Safety | Not performing safety monitoring as required by protocol, missing SAE/SUSAR reports, delayed reporting | | Blinding | Unblinding by unauthorized personnel, unrecorded emergency unblinding procedures | | Data Integrity | Falsifying/fabricating data, systematic missing of critical data | | Prohibited Operations | Violating key operational procedures of trial protocol, not performing key efficacy assessments |
Minor Deviation
Deviations unlikely to affect trial data integrity, subject safety, or trial scientific validity:
| Category | Examples | |------|------| | Visit Window | Slightly exceeding visit time window (e.g., within a few days), delay of non-critical visits | | Sample Collection | Minor timing deviations in non-critical sample collection, slight delays in sample processing | | Questionnaire Completion | Quality of life questionnaires/diary cards submitted a few days late | | Data Recording | Delays in non-critical data recording, spelling/formatting errors | | Procedure Execution | Adjustment of secondary procedure execution order, omission of non-critical assessments (e.g., height measurement) | | Documentation | Delays in source document signatures, missing secondary documents (e.g., non-critical examination reports) |
Usage
Python API
from scripts.main import DeviationClassifierInitialize classifier
classifier = DeviationClassifier()Classify single deviation
result = classifier.classify(
description="Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
deviation_type="Visit Window"
)
print(result.classification) # "Minor Deviation"
print(result.confidence) # 0.92
print(result.rationale) # Classification rationale explanationBatch classification
deviations = [
{"description": "Blood sample collected without informed consent", "type": "Informed Consent"},
{"description": "Quality of life questionnaire submitted 3 days late", "type": "Data Collection"}
]
batch_results = classifier.classify_batch(deviations)Generate report
report = classifier.generate_report(batch_results)
CLI Usage
# Classify single deviation
python scripts/main.py classify --description "Subject visit delayed by 2 days" --type "Visit Window"Batch classification from file
python scripts/main.py batch --input deviations.json --output report.jsonInteractive classification
python scripts/main.py interactiveAssess deviation impact
python scripts/main.py assess \
--description "Subject accidentally took double dose of investigational drug" \
--safety-impact high \
--data-impact medium \
--scientific-impact medium
Input Format
JSON Input File Format:
[
{
"id": "DEV-001",
"description": "Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
"type": "Visit Window",
"occurrence_date": "2024-01-15",
"severity_factors": {
"safety_impact": "none",
"data_impact": "low",
"scientific_impact": "low"
}
},
{
"id": "DEV-002",
"description": "Blood collection performed without informed consent",
"type": "Informed Consent",
"severity_factors": {
"safety_impact": "high",
"data_impact": "high",
"scientific_impact": "high"
}
}
]
Output Format
Classification Result:
{
"id": "DEV-001",
"classification": "Minor Deviation",
"classification_en": "Minor Deviation",
"confidence": 0.92,
"rationale": "Visit time window slightly delayed (2 days), does not affect subject safety, data integrity, or trial scientific validity.",
"risk_factors": {
"safety_risk": "none",
"data_integrity_risk": "low",
"scientific_validity_risk": "none"
},
"regulatory_basis": [
"ICH E6(R2) Section 4.5",
"GCP Section 6.4.4"
],
"recommended_actions": [
"Document in file",
"Track trends"
]
}
Classification Algorithm
Classification based on the following assessment dimensions:
1. Subject Safety Impact (Safety Impact) - None: No impact - Low: Minor impact - Medium: Moderate impact - High: Serious impact
2. Data Integrity Impact (Data Integrity Impact) - None: No impact - Low: Minor impact on non-critical data - Medium: Partial impact on critical data - High: Serious damage to critical data
3. Trial Scientific Validity Impact (Scientific Validity Impact) - None: No impact - Low: Minor impact on statistical power - Medium: May affect primary endpoint - High: Seriously affects trial conclusion
Classification Rules:
Regulatory Basis
Dependencies
Notes
1. This tool provides classification recommendations, final determination must be confirmed by clinical quality assurance personnel 2. Serious/critical deviations must be reported to sponsor and ethics committee immediately 3. It is recommended to regularly review deviation trends and implement CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions) 4. Classification standards may vary by regulatory agency, trial type, and protocol requirements
Risk Assessment
| Risk Indicator | Assessment | Level | |----------------|------------|-------| | Code Execution | Python/R scripts executed locally | Medium | | Network Access | No external API calls | Low | | File System Access | Read input files, write output files | Medium | | Instruction Tampering | Standard prompt guidelines | Low | | Data Exposure | Output files saved to workspace | Low |
Security Checklist
Prerequisites
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
Evaluation Criteria
Success Metrics
Test Cases
1. Basic Functionality: Standard input β Expected output 2. Edge Case: Invalid input β Graceful error handling 3. Performance: Large dataset β Acceptable processing timeLifecycle Status
π‘ Examples
Python API
from scripts.main import DeviationClassifierInitialize classifier
classifier = DeviationClassifier()Classify single deviation
result = classifier.classify(
description="Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
deviation_type="Visit Window"
)
print(result.classification) # "Minor Deviation"
print(result.confidence) # 0.92
print(result.rationale) # Classification rationale explanationBatch classification
deviations = [
{"description": "Blood sample collected without informed consent", "type": "Informed Consent"},
{"description": "Quality of life questionnaire submitted 3 days late", "type": "Data Collection"}
]
batch_results = classifier.classify_batch(deviations)Generate report
report = classifier.generate_report(batch_results)
CLI Usage
# Classify single deviation
python scripts/main.py classify --description "Subject visit delayed by 2 days" --type "Visit Window"Batch classification from file
python scripts/main.py batch --input deviations.json --output report.jsonInteractive classification
python scripts/main.py interactiveAssess deviation impact
python scripts/main.py assess \
--description "Subject accidentally took double dose of investigational drug" \
--safety-impact high \
--data-impact medium \
--scientific-impact medium
Input Format
JSON Input File Format:
[
{
"id": "DEV-001",
"description": "Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
"type": "Visit Window",
"occurrence_date": "2024-01-15",
"severity_factors": {
"safety_impact": "none",
"data_impact": "low",
"scientific_impact": "low"
}
},
{
"id": "DEV-002",
"description": "Blood collection performed without informed consent",
"type": "Informed Consent",
"severity_factors": {
"safety_impact": "high",
"data_impact": "high",
"scientific_impact": "high"
}
}
]
Output Format
Classification Result:
{
"id": "DEV-001",
"classification": "Minor Deviation",
"classification_en": "Minor Deviation",
"confidence": 0.92,
"rationale": "Visit time window slightly delayed (2 days), does not affect subject safety, data integrity, or trial scientific validity.",
"risk_factors": {
"safety_risk": "none",
"data_integrity_risk": "low",
"scientific_validity_risk": "none"
},
"regulatory_basis": [
"ICH E6(R2) Section 4.5",
"GCP Section 6.4.4"
],
"recommended_actions": [
"Document in file",
"Track trends"
]
}
βοΈ Configuration
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
π Tips & Best Practices
1. This tool provides classification recommendations, final determination must be confirmed by clinical quality assurance personnel 2. Serious/critical deviations must be reported to sponsor and ethics committee immediately 3. It is recommended to regularly review deviation trends and implement CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions) 4. Classification standards may vary by regulatory agency, trial type, and protocol requirements