🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter Guide β€” Subscribe β†’
BytesAgainBytesAgain
πŸ¦€ ClawHub

Release Notes

by @mike47512

User-facing change logs: categories, clarity, links. Use when maintaining CHANGELOG or release notes.

Versionv1.0.0
Downloads402
TERMINAL
clawhub install release-notes

πŸ“– About This Skill


name: release-notes description: "User-facing change logs: categories, clarity, links. Use when maintaining CHANGELOG or release notes."

Release Notes

Structured guidance for CHANGELOG files and release notes: confirm triggers, propose the stages below, and adapt if the user wants a lighter pass.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • User mentions release notes, CHANGELOG, what shipped, or closely related work
  • They want a structured workflow rather than ad-hoc tips
  • They are preparing a review, rollout, or stakeholder communication
  • Initial offer: Explain the four stages briefly and ask whether to follow this workflow or work freeform. If they decline, continue in their preferred style.

    Workflow Stages

    Stage 1: Clarify context & goals

    Anchor on audience (users vs developers) and cadence (per release vs continuous). Ask what success looks like and what must not break.

    Stage 2: Structure & categories

    Group changes (features, fixes, breaking, security). Prefer links to issues/PRs and migration notes when breaking.

    Stage 3: Draft & refine

    Iterate for clarity: imperative mood, scannable bullets, version headers aligned with semver or product versioning.

    Stage 4: Verify & ship

    Close the loop with tone: concise and verifiable: monitoring, documentation, stakeholder updates, and lessons learned for the next cycle.

    Checklist Before Completion

  • Goals and constraints are explicit for release notes work
  • Risks and trade-offs are stated, not hand-waved
  • Verification steps match the change’s impact (tests, canary, peer review)
  • Operational follow-through is covered (monitoring, docs, owners)
  • Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Be procedural: stage-by-stage, with clear exit criteria
  • Ask for missing context (environment, scale, deadlines) before prescribing
  • Prefer checklists and concrete examples over generic platitudes
  • If the user declines the workflow, switch to freeform help without lecturing
  • Handling Deviations

  • If the user wants to skip a stage: confirm and continue with what they need.
  • If context is missing: ask targeted questions before strong recommendations.
  • Prefer concrete examples, trade-offs, and verification steps over generic advice.
  • Quality Bar

  • Each recommendation should be actionable (what to do next).
  • Call out failure modes relevant to release communication (security, scale, UX, or ops).
  • Keep tone direct and respectful of the user’s time.