🎁 Get the FREE AI Skills Starter Guide — Subscribe →
BytesAgainBytesAgain
🦀 ClawHub

Vendor Contracts

by @mike47512

Pragmatic review of software contracts: IP, liability, SLAs. Use when triaging vendor agreements (not legal advice).

Versionv1.0.0
Downloads801
TERMINAL
clawhub install vendor-contracts

📖 About This Skill


name: vendor-contracts description: "Pragmatic review of software contracts: IP, liability, SLAs. Use when triaging vendor agreements (not legal advice)."

Vendor Contracts

Structured guidance for software and vendor agreements (IP, liability, SLAs—not legal advice): confirm triggers, propose the stages below, and adapt if the user wants a lighter pass.

When to Offer This Workflow

Trigger conditions:

  • User mentions MSA, order form, vendor agreement, contract review, or closely related work
  • They want a structured workflow rather than ad-hoc tips
  • They are preparing a review, rollout, or stakeholder communication
  • Initial offer: Explain the four stages briefly and ask whether to follow this workflow or work freeform. If they decline, continue in their preferred style.

    Workflow Stages

    Stage 1: Clarify context & goals

    Anchor on deal type (SaaS, support, data processing) and risk appetite. Ask what success looks like and what must not break.

    Stage 2: Structure & categories

    Cover commercial, legal, security, data, and exit themes; flag unclear liability caps and indemnities for human counsel.

    Stage 3: Draft & refine

    Produce a red-flag summary and question list for legal/business owners—not definitive legal conclusions.

    Stage 4: Verify & ship

    Close the loop with owners, security review, and procurement steps as needed.

    Checklist Before Completion

  • Goals and constraints are explicit for vendor contract review
  • Risks and trade-offs are stated, not hand-waved
  • Verification steps match the change’s impact (tests, canary, peer review)
  • Operational follow-through is covered (monitoring, docs, owners)
  • Tips for Effective Guidance

  • Be procedural: stage-by-stage, with clear exit criteria
  • Ask for missing context (environment, scale, deadlines) before prescribing
  • Prefer checklists and concrete examples over generic platitudes
  • If the user declines the workflow, switch to freeform help without lecturing
  • Handling Deviations

  • If the user wants to skip a stage: confirm and continue with what they need.
  • If context is missing: ask targeted questions before strong recommendations.
  • Prefer concrete examples, trade-offs, and verification steps over generic advice.
  • Quality Bar

  • Each recommendation should be actionable (what to do next).
  • Call out failure modes relevant to vendor agreements (security, scale, UX, or ops).
  • Keep tone direct and respectful of the user’s time.